The traditional view of data as essence-based is limiting to the user or organization or changing external operating environments.
But I worry in the same vein that a ‘socio-technical system’ framework can create rigidity, challenges to scaling, and is not easily adaptable to changing external circumstances beyond a team or company’s control.
‘Mission/Purpose-defined value creation objectives’ might be something that could make the framework more flexible, adaptable and scalable perhaps.
Yes, this is a valid concern. I think we need a combination, fitting the environment you operate within, both towards external stakeholders, regulators, but also market reality.
The existence approach opens for that: an active negotiations of value and meaning.
I have a patent pending regarding a new governance layer within AI where the human, exactly as you described, is proactive with their governing intent.
If you were to build a system to address the problems you/we are all seeing with data governance… how would you design it? I’d love to pick your brain on your perspective — I want to live in a world where we own our own data and govern our own intent.
The traditional view of data as essence-based is limiting to the user or organization or changing external operating environments.
But I worry in the same vein that a ‘socio-technical system’ framework can create rigidity, challenges to scaling, and is not easily adaptable to changing external circumstances beyond a team or company’s control.
‘Mission/Purpose-defined value creation objectives’ might be something that could make the framework more flexible, adaptable and scalable perhaps.
Yes, this is a valid concern. I think we need a combination, fitting the environment you operate within, both towards external stakeholders, regulators, but also market reality.
The existence approach opens for that: an active negotiations of value and meaning.
Thank you for the comment!
I have a patent pending regarding a new governance layer within AI where the human, exactly as you described, is proactive with their governing intent.
If you were to build a system to address the problems you/we are all seeing with data governance… how would you design it? I’d love to pick your brain on your perspective — I want to live in a world where we own our own data and govern our own intent.